flutter_ume_kit_designer_check 0.0.2 flutter_ume_kit_designer_check: ^0.0.2 copied to clipboard
UI check tool for designer.
We analyzed this package 3 days ago, and awarded it 115 pub points (of a possible 160):
0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml
The package description is too short.
Add more detail to the description
field of pubspec.yaml
. Use 60 to 180 characters to describe the package, what it does, and its target use case.
Homepage URL doesn't exist.
At the time of the analysis https://github.com/cfug/flutter_ume_kit
was unreachable. Make sure that the website is reachable via HEAD
requests.
Failed to verify repository URL.
Please provide a valid repository
URL in pubspec.yaml
, such that:
repository
can be cloned,- a clone of the repository contains a
pubspec.yaml
, which:,- contains
name: flutter_ume_kit_designer_check
, - contains a
version
property, and, - does not contain a
publish_to
property.
- contains
Unable to access git repository: Failed to run remote show origin
.
0/5 points: Provide a valid README.md
`README.md` contains too many non-ASCII characters.
The site uses English as its primary language. The content of README.md
in your package should primarily contain characters used in English.
5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md
10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license
Detected license: MIT
.
0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments
3 out of 17 API elements (17.6 %) have documentation comments.
Providing good documentation for libraries, classes, functions, and other API elements improves code readability and helps developers find and use your API. Document at least 20% of the public API elements.
To highlight public API members missing documentation consider enabling the public_member_api_docs
lint.
Some symbols that are missing documentation: flutter_ume_kit_designer_check
, flutter_ume_kit_designer_check.DesignerCheck
, flutter_ume_kit_designer_check.DesignerCheck.DesignerCheck
, flutter_ume_kit_designer_check.DesignerCheck.buildWidget
, flutter_ume_kit_designer_check.DesignerCheck.displayName
.
0/10 points: Package has an example
No example found.
See package layout guidelines on how to add an example.
20/20 points: Supports 5 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)
-
✓ Android
-
✓ iOS
-
✓ Windows
-
✓ Linux
-
✓ macOS
These platforms are not supported:
Package not compatible with platform Web
Because:
package:flutter_ume_kit_designer_check/flutter_ume_kit_designer_check.dart
that imports:package:flutter_ume_kit_designer_check/src/designer_check.dart
that imports:dart:io
0/0 points: WASM compatibility
Package not compatible with runtime wasm
Because:
package:flutter_ume_kit_designer_check/flutter_ume_kit_designer_check.dart
that imports:package:flutter_ume_kit_designer_check/src/designer_check.dart
that imports:dart:io
This package is not compatible with runtime wasm
, and will not be rewarded full points in a future version of the scoring model.
See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.
50/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues
0/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version
Package | Constraint | Compatible | Latest |
---|---|---|---|
flutter |
flutter |
0.0.0 | 0.0.0 |
flutter_ume |
>=0.3.0 <0.4.0 |
0.3.0+1 | 1.1.2 |
image_picker |
^0.8.5 |
0.8.9 | 1.1.2 |
Transitive dependencies
Package | Constraint | Compatible | Latest |
---|---|---|---|
async |
- | 2.12.0 | 2.12.0 |
characters |
- | 1.3.0 | 1.4.0 |
clock |
- | 1.1.1 | 1.1.2 |
collection |
- | 1.19.0 | 1.19.1 |
cross_file |
- | 0.3.4+2 | 0.3.4+2 |
ffi |
- | 2.1.3 | 2.1.3 |
file |
- | 7.0.1 | 7.0.1 |
file_selector_linux |
- | 0.9.3+2 | 0.9.3+2 |
file_selector_macos |
- | 0.9.4+2 | 0.9.4+2 |
file_selector_platform_interface |
- | 2.6.2 | 2.6.2 |
file_selector_windows |
- | 0.9.3+3 | 0.9.3+3 |
flutter_localizations |
- | 0.0.0 | 0.0.0 |
flutter_plugin_android_lifecycle |
- | 2.0.24 | 2.0.24 |
flutter_web_plugins |
- | 0.0.0 | 0.0.0 |
http |
- | 1.2.2 | 1.2.2 |
http_parser |
- | 4.1.1 | 4.1.1 |
image_picker_android |
- | 0.8.12+19 | 0.8.12+19 |
image_picker_for_web |
- | 2.2.0 | 3.0.6 |
image_picker_ios |
- | 0.8.12+1 | 0.8.12+1 |
image_picker_linux |
- | 0.2.1+1 | 0.2.1+1 |
image_picker_macos |
- | 0.2.1+1 | 0.2.1+1 |
image_picker_platform_interface |
- | 2.10.0 | 2.10.0 |
image_picker_windows |
- | 0.2.1+1 | 0.2.1+1 |
intl |
- | 0.19.0 | 0.20.1 |
material_color_utilities |
- | 0.11.1 | 0.12.0 |
meta |
- | 1.15.0 | 1.16.0 |
mime |
- | 1.0.6 | 2.0.0 |
path |
- | 1.9.0 | 1.9.1 |
path_provider_linux |
- | 2.2.1 | 2.2.1 |
path_provider_platform_interface |
- | 2.1.2 | 2.1.2 |
path_provider_windows |
- | 2.3.0 | 2.3.0 |
platform |
- | 3.1.6 | 3.1.6 |
plugin_platform_interface |
- | 2.1.8 | 2.1.8 |
shared_preferences |
- | 2.3.4 | 2.3.4 |
shared_preferences_android |
- | 2.4.0 | 2.4.0 |
shared_preferences_foundation |
- | 2.5.4 | 2.5.4 |
shared_preferences_linux |
- | 2.4.1 | 2.4.1 |
shared_preferences_platform_interface |
- | 2.4.1 | 2.4.1 |
shared_preferences_web |
- | 2.4.2 | 2.4.2 |
shared_preferences_windows |
- | 2.4.1 | 2.4.1 |
sky_engine |
- | 0.0.0 | 0.0.0 |
source_span |
- | 1.10.1 | 1.10.1 |
string_scanner |
- | 1.4.1 | 1.4.1 |
term_glyph |
- | 1.2.2 | 1.2.2 |
tuple |
- | 2.0.2 | 2.0.2 |
typed_data |
- | 1.4.0 | 1.4.0 |
vector_math |
- | 2.1.4 | 2.1.4 |
vm_service |
- | 7.5.0 | 15.0.0 |
web |
- | 1.1.0 | 1.1.0 |
xdg_directories |
- | 1.1.0 | 1.1.0 |
To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides
.
The constraint `>=0.3.0 <0.4.0` on flutter_ume does not support the stable version `1.0.0`.
Try running dart pub upgrade --major-versions flutter_ume
to update the constraint.
The constraint `^0.8.5` on image_picker does not support the stable version `1.0.0`.
Try running dart pub upgrade --major-versions image_picker
to update the constraint.
10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs
20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds
pub downgrade
does not expose any static analysis error.
Analyzed with Pana 0.22.17
, Flutter 3.27.0
, Dart 3.6.0
.
Check the analysis log for details.