0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

0/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

10/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

380 out of 1008 API elements (37.7 %) have documentation comments.

Some symbols that are missing documentation: adjective_star, analyzer, analyzer.getSurroundedPalaces, analyzer.mutagensToStars, astro.

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ Linux

• ✓ macOS

• ✓ Web

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.

0/0 points: Swift Package Manager support

This package for iOS or macOS does not support the Swift Package Manager. It will not receive full points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://docs.flutter.dev/to/spm for details.

30/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 40 issues. Showing the first 2:

    ╷
112 │     if (indexOfPalace != null) {
    │                       ^^^^^^^
    ╵

    ╷
120 │       if (item!.isOriginalPalace && indexOfPalace?.key == "originalPalace") {
    │               ^
    ╵

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.