easy_use_camera 0.0.12 copy "easy_use_camera: ^0.0.12" to clipboard
easy_use_camera: ^0.0.12 copied to clipboard

Easy to use camera for all platform.

EasyUseCamera #

๐ŸŒ About Project #

This package for use camera take picture & video for all platform

๐Ÿ›  Built With #

source structure : #

/my_camera
  example/
        lib/
          main.dart
  lib/
    camera/
        dialog/
        widget/
        take_picture.dart
    my_camera.dart    

๐Ÿงพ Setting up the project #

Android : #

android {
  ...
  defaultConfig {
  minSdkVersion 21
  }
}

iOS : #

<key>NSCameraUsageDescription</key>
<string>This app needs access to camera when used</string>
<key>NSMicrophoneUsageDescription</key>
<string>This app needs access to microphone when used</string>

PWA : #

We need SSL on host

Naming #

what how etc
Classes, enums, typedefs Pascal Case ProductBloc
Libraries, packages, directories, and source files names snake_case product_detail_view
Variables, constants, parameters, and named parameters camel Case variants

Cleaning #

Read this article about clean coding in flutter

  • Create widgets int uikit for common components
  • Don't use directly colors or font style, use uikit
  • Split widgets into sub Widgets
  • Create components package for sub widgets in each features
  • Specify types for class member
  • Use if condition instead of conditional expression
  • Use ?? and ?. operators
  • User cascade operators
    // Don't
    var path = Path();
    path.lineTo(0, size.height);
    path.lineTo(size.width, size.height);
    path.lineTo(size.width, 0);
    path.close();
    
    
    // Do
    var path = Path()
    ..lineTo(0, size.height)
    ..lineTo(size.width, size.height)
    ..lineTo(size.width, 0)
    ..close();
    
    
  • Use Const in Widgets

โ›‘ Code Review #

What Do Code Reviewers Look For?

  • Code reviews should look at:

  • Design: Is the code well-designed and appropriate for your system?

  • Functionality: Does the code behave as the author likely intended? Is the way the code behaves well for its users?

  • Complexity: Could the code be made simpler? Would another developer be able to easily understand and use this code when they come across it in the future?

  • Tests: Does the code have correct and well-designed automated tests?

  • Naming: Did the developer choose clear names for variables, classes, methods, etc.?

  • Comments: Are the comments clear and useful?

  • Style: Does the code follow our style guides?

  • Documentation: Did the developer also update relevant documentation?

  • How to implement code review?

According to the above points every merge request (pull request), must meet the check-list for ensuring about any concern maybe happened in the process.

  • check branch is not broken
  • check feature is fulfill
  • check test-case is passed
  • check code style (with lint or manually)
  • check readability
  • check side-effects
  • check consistency with other class/package/module
  • check all comments on the merge request
  • The reviewer if has any point about the merge request (pull request) leaves a comment on the line.

๐Ÿ“š Acknowledgements #