flutter3d_hardware 1.0.0-rc.1

The graphics vocabulary flutter3d is written against: formats, handles, a command encoder and a device. Names no graphics API. No Flutter, no renderer.

flutter3d_hardware

The vocabulary flutter3d writes a frame in: texture and buffer handles, formats, render targets, pipelines, a command encoder and a shader library.

The package contains no implementation. Three implementations exist, flutter3d_impeller over flutter_gpu, flutter3d_webgl over WebGL2 and flutter3d_cpu in plain Dart, and this package is what they have in common. An engine written against it can be handed a backend as a value, so a software renderer can draw the same frame a GPU does and a test can check that it did.

HAL.md describes the whole layer, member by member, for engine contributors and backend authors.

What is deliberately not here

Anything a backend can decide for itself. There is no device enumeration, swapchain or window: an application opens a backend and hands it over, and the engine never learns which one it got.

Choosing a backend

Each engine owns a DeviceRegistry. A backend package adds itself to the one it is handed: registerGpuBackend(registry), registerWebGlBackend and registerCpuBackend each call registry.addBackend(name, open, asFallback: ...). Then registry.open(width:, height:) opens the first backend that starts, newest first, then the fallback. What shows a finished frame is added the same way, registry.addPresenter<MyDevice>(presenter), and found with registry.presenterFor(device). Every addition is a Registration that takes it out again, so a test's fake backend does not leak into the next test. flutter3d_app's platformDevices() makes a registry with this platform's backends.

The contract

What a backend must actually do is defined by flutter3d_conformance, a suite each backend runs against itself. An interface can only say that a call exists. The conformance suite checks that a clear covers the whole attachment and that uploaded pixels keep their row order.

Capabilities and stability

Ask one question. device.features.has(DeviceFeature.textureArrays), device.limits.maxColorAttachments, device.textureFormatSupport(format). The features are WebGPU's where WebGPU names one, plus what WebGL2 and the engine add (render-to-mip-level, wireframe, synchronous readback, multi-draw). The contract covers what WebGPU and WebGL2 can do between them: compute, storage buffers and textures, texture arrays, 3D and cube arrays, mapped and synchronous readback, buffer and texture copies, indirect and multi-draws, occlusion, timestamp and pipeline-statistics queries, render bundles, compressed formats and multisample resolve.

A missing capability is a refusal, never a substitution. Every call a feature gates throws UnsupportedCapabilityException, naming the feature, the backend and the reason, before anything reaches a driver. A backend that has not built something yet says so the same way: Impeller lacks most of the 1.0 surface until flutter_gpu exposes it, and each gap is an explicit refusal with a TODO(impeller) at it. When the backend gains the feature it starts listing it; nothing here changes. flutter3d_conformance's capabilityChecks holds every backend to its own report in both directions.

The pre-1.0 getters (supportsCompute, supportsWireframe, maxAnisotropy and the rest) are gone in 1.0.0. dart run flutter3d_build:migrate rewrites each into the features.has(DeviceFeature.x) or limits question that replaced it.

A few capabilities are types rather than features: EncodedImageUpload on a device, RenderBundleEncoder on an encoder, and SynchronousBufferReadback, which the main library does not export, since a stall belongs in a test and not in a frame: a caller imports it from package:flutter3d_hardware/testing.dart, and a backend mixes it in from backend.dart. Each is asked with is, and where a DeviceFeature names the same thing a device lists it exactly when it is the type.

Who owns a handle

Every handle a device makes has one owner, the code that asked for it, and a dispose that gives it back once. Disposing twice and using a disposed handle are mistakes, and a debug build says so: the second dispose asserts, and a backend calls debugCheckLive before it binds, draws from, copies or reads a handle. On Impeller, whose flutter_gpu objects have no native dispose, the memory comes back through the collector once nothing holds the object. FakeBackend.liveHandles lists what a test made and did not give back.

Stable means the snapshot. From 1.0 this package follows strict semver, and every backend depends on it through a caret range. api/flutter3d_hardware.api lists every public symbol and signature, and the repository's structure scan fails on any difference — the same check every published package has (see "The API is a snapshot" in the repository's CONTRIBUTING.md). A change to the surface therefore needs a version decision before it can pass:

• removing or changing anything listed is a major version;
• adding a member to a type a backend builds on is a minor version, because GraphicsDevice, ComputeEncoder and TransferEncoder are abstract base classes and PassEncoder an abstract base mixin class: a backend extends them, and a new member arrives with a body (a feature-gated one throws UnsupportedCapabilityException) that a backend overrides once it has the feature. Every feature-gated member of the three encoders has that body already. A member without a default body would break every backend, so it waits for a major;
• adding a DeviceFeature, a field with a default to a descriptor, or a new top-level type is a minor version.

package:flutter3d_hardware/backend.dart, the handle constructors and the debugCheckLive check a backend author needs, is held to the same rule: it is in the snapshot, a constructor there gains only optional parameters within a major, and a backend written against 1.0.0 compiles against every 1.x.

Regenerate with dart run api_snapshot --update flutter3d_hardware from the repository's tool/api once the decision is recorded in CHANGELOG.md. Capabilities that are coming but not designed in detail yet — ray queries, mesh shaders, bindless resources, immediate data — are reserved DeviceFeatures: named, reported by no backend, and added as calls without breaking anything.

---

Part of flutter3d, an independent implementation of a 3D engine for Flutter. It is not a fork or a binding of another engine, and it is not affiliated with Google or the Flutter project. It has four switchable rendering backends: Impeller via Flutter GPU, WebGL2, WebGPU and a software rasteriser. It loads glTF, OBJ and .f3d, and has six lighting models, shadows, bloom, skinning, animation, BVH culling and picking, plus a deterministic fixed-step game layer with collision, navigation, positional audio, and gamepad and touch input. Four example games (shooter, platformer, racing, strategy) are each built on a genre package: flutter3d_game_shooter, flutter3d_game_platformer, flutter3d_game_racing, flutter3d_game_strategy. A new game starts from the editor's scaffold, which writes one from a template: https://flutter3d.pleion.dev/first-project/. Documentation: https://flutter3d.pleion.dev.