0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: BSD-3-Clause.

0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

OUT: Documenting service_worker... Discovering libraries... Linking elements... Precaching local docs for 142044 elements... Initialized dartdoc with 58 libraries Generating docs for library window.dart from package:service_worker/window.dart... Generating docs for library worker.dart from package:service_worker/worker.dart... Generating docs for library service_worker.dart from package:service_worker/service_worker.dart... Documented 3 public libraries in 20.1 seconds ERR: warning: ambiguous reexport of service_worker_api.ServiceWorkerRegistration, canonicalization candidates: (service_worker, service_worker, service_worker.window) -> service_worker.window (confide[...] from service_worker_api.ServiceWorkerRegistration: (file:///tmp/pana_QTSQKI/lib/src/service_worker_api.dart:447:7) service_worker: 0.2100 - (_Reason.deprecated (-1.000), _Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.2000)) service_worker: 1.210 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.2000)) service_worker.window: 1.220 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.02000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.2000)) Use {@canonicalFor service_worker_api.ServiceWorkerRegistration} in the desired library's documentation to resolve the ambiguity and/or override dartdoc's decision, or structure your package so the reexport is less ambiguous. The symbol will still be referenced in all candidates -- this only controls the location where it will be written and which library [91 more lines]

0/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 1 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Web

These platforms are not supported:

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is not compatible with runtime wasm, and will not be rewarded full points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 17 issues. Showing the first 2:

  ╷
6 │ import 'package:js/js.dart';
  │ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  ╵

  ╷
7 │ import 'package:js/js_util.dart' as js_util;
  │ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  ╵

0/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

0/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

downgrade analysis failed failed with 8 errors:

• UNDEFINED_ANNOTATION - lib/src/js_facade/isomorphic_fetch.dart:54:1 - Undefined name 'staticInterop' used as an annotation.
• UNDEFINED_ANNOTATION - lib/src/js_facade/isomorphic_fetch.dart:80:1 - Undefined name 'staticInterop' used as an annotation.
• UNDEFINED_ANNOTATION - lib/src/js_facade/isomorphic_fetch.dart:88:1 - Undefined name 'staticInterop' used as an annotation.

Run dart pub downgrade and then dart analyze to reproduce the above problem.

You may run dart pub upgrade --tighten to update your dependency constraints, see dart.dev/go/downgrade-testing for details.