senior_debug 1.0.1 
senior_debug: ^1.0.1 copied to clipboard
moti.monsterdebug like a senior using `here` and `here`
We analyzed this package 2 days ago, and awarded it 130 pub points (of a possible 160):
0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml
The package description is too short.
Add more detail to the description field of pubspec.yaml. Use 60 to 180 characters to describe the package, what it does, and its target use case.
Repository URL doesn't exist.
At the time of the analysis https://github.com/FMotalleb/dart_senior_debug was unreachable. Make sure that the website is reachable via HEAD requests.
Failed to verify repository URL.
Please provide a valid repository URL in pubspec.yaml, such that:
repositorycan be cloned,- a clone of the repository contains a
pubspec.yaml, which:,- contains
name: senior_debug, - contains a
versionproperty, and, - does not contain a
publish_toproperty.
- contains
Unable to access git repository: Failed to run remote show origin.
5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md
5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md
10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license
Detected license: MIT.
0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments
1 out of 10 API elements (10.0 %) have documentation comments.
Providing good documentation for libraries, classes, functions, and other API elements improves code readability and helps developers find and use your API. Document at least 20% of the public API elements.
To highlight public API members missing documentation consider enabling the public_member_api_docs lint.
Some symbols that are missing documentation: senior_dbg.SeniorDebug, senior_dbg.SeniorDebug.SeniorDebug, senior_dbg.SeniorDebug.call, senior_dbg.SeniorDebug.here, senior_dbg.SeniorDebug.initialMessage.
10/10 points: Package has an example
20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)
-
✓ Android
-
✓ iOS
-
✓ Windows
-
✓ Linux
-
✓ macOS
-
✓ Web
0/0 points: WASM compatibility
This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.
See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.
40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues
/tmp/pana_JRVLFR/lib/src/senior_debug_base.dart doesn't match the Dart formatter.
To format your files run: dart format .
10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version
| Package | Constraint | Compatible | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
stack_trace |
^1.11.1 |
1.12.0 | 1.12.0 |
Transitive dependencies
| Package | Constraint | Compatible | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
path |
- | 1.9.1 | 1.9.1 |
To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.
10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs
20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds
pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.
Analyzed with Pana 0.22.15, Dart 3.5.4.
Check the analysis log for details.
Metadata
Publisher
Metadata
debug like a senior using `here` and `here`
Repository (GitHub)
View/report issues
Documentation
License
MIT (license)
