netglade_analysis 7.0.0 
netglade_analysis: ^7.0.0 copied to clipboard
netglade.czLint rules for Dart and Flutter used internally at netglade.
We analyzed this package 2 days ago, and awarded it 150 pub points (of a possible 160):
0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml
Failed to verify repository URL.
Please provide a valid repository URL in pubspec.yaml, such that:
repositorycan be cloned,- a clone of the repository contains a
pubspec.yaml, which:,- contains
name: netglade_analysis, - contains a
versionproperty, and, - does not contain a
publish_toproperty.
- contains
packages/netglade_analysis/pubspec.yaml from the repository URL mismatch: expected https://github.com/netglade/netglade_analysis but got https://github.com/netglade/flutter_core.
5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md
5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md
10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license
Detected license: MIT.
10/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments
1 out of 1 API elements (100.0 %) have documentation comments.
10/10 points: Package has an example and has no issues with screenshots
20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)
- ✓ Android
- ✓ iOS
- ✓ Windows
- ✓ Linux
- ✓ macOS
- ✓ Web
50/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues
10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version
No dependencies.
To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.
10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs
20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds
pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.
Analyzed with Pana 0.22.5, Dart 3.4.1.
Check the analysis log for details.
Metadata
Publisher
Metadata
Lint rules for Dart and Flutter used internally at netglade.
Repository (GitHub)
View/report issues
Documentation
License
MIT (LICENSE)
