10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

OUT: Documenting mkm... Discovering libraries... Linking elements... Precaching local docs for 142535 elements... Initialized dartdoc with 83 libraries Generating docs for library format.dart from package:mkm/format.dart... Generating docs for library ext.dart from package:mkm/ext.dart... Generating docs for library type.dart from package:mkm/type.dart... Generating docs for library crypto.dart from package:mkm/crypto.dart... Generating docs for library digest.dart from package:mkm/digest.dart... [3 more lines] ERR: warning: ambiguous reexport of encode.TransportableData, canonicalization candidates: (mkm, mkm, mkm) -> mkm (confidence 0.000) from encode.TransportableData: (file:///tmp/pana_BCZRLT/lib/src/format/encode.dart:50:26) mkm: 1.178 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.1667), _Reason.locationPartStart (+0.001000)) mkm: 1.178 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.1667), _Reason.locationPartStart (+0.001000)) mkm: 1.178 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.1667), _Reason.locationPartStart (+0.001000)) Use {@canonicalFor encode.TransportableData} in the desired library's documentation to resolve the ambiguity and/or override dartdoc's decision, or structure your package so the reexport is less ambiguous. The symbol will still be referenced in all candidates -- this only controls the location where it will be written and which library will be [335 more lines]

0/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ Linux

• ✓ macOS

• ✓ Web

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 30 issues. Showing the first 2:

    ╷
144 │   ///   Map<String, dynamic>
    │            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ╵

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

No dependencies.

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.