10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

10/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

21 out of 34 API elements (61.8 %) have documentation comments.

Some symbols that are missing documentation: function_defs, function_defs.Func0, function_defs.Func1, function_defs.Func2, function_defs.Func3.

0/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ Linux

• ✓ macOS

• ✓ Web

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 11 issues. Showing the first 2:

  ╷
1 │ typedef R Func0<R>();
  │           ^^^^^
  ╵

  ╷
2 │ typedef R Func1<A, R>(A a);
  │           ^^^^^
  ╵

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

No dependencies.

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.