flutter_pay_upi 0.2.1 
flutter_pay_upi: ^0.2.1 copied to clipboard
Create app with UPI (Unified Payments Interface)
We analyzed this package 7 days ago, and awarded it 150 pub points (of a possible 160):
0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml
The package description is too short.
Add more detail to the description field of pubspec.yaml. Use 60 to 180 characters to describe the package, what it does, and its target use case.
Issue tracker URL doesn't exist.
At the time of the analysis https://github.com/abhishekbardolia/flutter_pay_upi/issues was unreachable. Make sure that the website is reachable via HEAD requests.
5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md
5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md
10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license
Detected license: MIT.
10/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments
54 out of 106 API elements (50.9 %) have documentation comments.
Some symbols that are missing documentation: exception, flutter_native_upi, flutter_pay_upi_manager, flutter_pay_upi_manager.FlutterPayUpiManager.appendAndMakeUrl, get_upi_app_list.
10/10 points: Package has an example
20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)
-
✓ Android
-
✓ iOS
-
✓ Windows
-
✓ Linux
-
✓ macOS
-
✓ Web
These issues are present but do not affect the score, because they may not originate in your package:
Package not compatible with platform Web
Because:
package:flutter_pay_upi/flutter_pay_upi_manager.dartthat imports:dart:io
0/0 points: WASM compatibility
Package not compatible with runtime wasm
Because:
package:flutter_pay_upi/flutter_pay_upi_manager.dartthat imports:dart:io
This package is not compatible with runtime wasm, and will not be rewarded full points in a future version of the scoring model.
See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.
0/0 points: Swift Package Manager support
Package does not support the Swift Package Manager on macOS
It does not contain macos/flutter_pay_upi/Package.swift.
This package for iOS or macOS does not support the Swift Package Manager. It will not receive full points in a future version of the scoring model.
See https://docs.flutter.dev/to/spm for details.
50/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues
10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version
| Package | Constraint | Compatible | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
flutter |
flutter |
0.0.0 | 0.0.0 |
flutter_web_plugins |
flutter |
0.0.0 | 0.0.0 |
plugin_platform_interface |
^2.0.2 |
2.1.8 | 2.1.8 |
Transitive dependencies
| Package | Constraint | Compatible | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|
characters |
- | 1.3.0 | 1.4.0 |
collection |
- | 1.19.0 | 1.19.1 |
material_color_utilities |
- | 0.11.1 | 0.12.0 |
meta |
- | 1.15.0 | 1.16.0 |
sky_engine |
- | 0.0.0 | 0.0.0 |
vector_math |
- | 2.1.4 | 2.1.4 |
To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.
10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs
20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds
pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.
Analyzed with Pana 0.22.17, Flutter 3.27.0, Dart 3.6.0.
Check the analysis log for details.
Metadata
Publisher
unverified uploader
Weekly Downloads
Metadata
Create app with UPI (Unified Payments Interface)
Repository (GitHub)
View/report issues
Documentation
License
MIT (license)
Dependencies
flutter, flutter_web_plugins, plugin_platform_interface
