approval_tests 1.1.3 approval_tests: ^1.1.3 copied to clipboard
Approval Tests implementation in Dart. Inspired by ApprovalTests.
Approval Tests implementation in Dart 🚀
📖 About #
Approval Tests are an alternative to assertions. You’ll find them useful for testing objects with complex values (such as long strings), lots of properties, or collections of objects.
Approval tests
simplify this by taking a snapshot of the results, and confirming that they have not changed.
In normal unit testing, you say expect(person.getAge(), 5)
. Approvals allow you to do this when the thing that you want to assert is no longer a primitive but a complex object. For example, you can say, Approvals.verify(person)
.
I am writing an implementation of Approval Tests in Dart. If anyone wants to help, please text me. 🙏
Packages #
ApprovalTests is designed for two level: Dart and Flutter.
Package | Version | Description |
---|---|---|
approval_tests | Dart package for approval testing of unit tests (main) |
|
approval_tests_flutter | Flutter package for approval testing of widget , integration tests |
📋 How it works #
- The first run of the test automatically creates an
approved
file if there is no such file. - If the changed results match the
approved
file perfectly, the test passes. - If there's a difference, a
reporter
tool will highlight the mismatch and the test fails. - If the test is passed, the
received
file is deleted automatically. You can change this by changing thedeleteReceivedFile
value inoptions
. If the test fails, the received file remains for analysis.
📦 Installation #
Add the following to your pubspec.yaml
file:
dependencies:
approval_tests: ^1.1.0
👀 Getting Started #
The best way to get started is to download and open the starter project:
This is a standard project that can be imported into any editor or IDE and also includes CI with GitHub Actions.
It comes ready with:
- A suitable
.gitignore
to exclude approval artifacts - A ready linter with all rules in place
- A GitHub action to run tests and you can always check the status of the tests on the badge in the
README.md
file.
📚 How to use #
In order to use Approval Tests
, the user needs to:
-
Set up a test: This involves importing the Approval Tests library into your own code.
-
Optionally, set up a reporter: Reporters are tools that highlight differences between approved and received files when a test fails. Although not necessary, they make it significantly easier to see what changes have caused a test to fail. The default reporter is the
CommandLineReporter
. You can also use theDiffReporter
to compare the files in your IDE, and theGitReporter
to see the differences in theGit GUI
. -
Manage the
approved
file: When the test is run for the first time, an approved file is created automatically. This file will represent the expected outcome. Once the test results in a favorable outcome, the approved file should be updated to reflect these changes. A little bit below I wrote how to do it.
This setup is useful because it shortens feedback loops, saving developers time by only highlighting what has been altered rather than requiring them to parse through their entire output to see what effect their changes had.
Approving Results #
Approving results just means saving the .approved.txt
file with your desired results.
We’ll provide more explanation in due course, but, briefly, here are the most common approaches to do this.
• Via Diff Tool
Most diff tools have the ability to move text from left to right, and save the result.
How to use diff tools is just below, there is a Comparator
class for that.
• Via CLI command
You can run the command in a terminal to review your files:
dart run approval_tests:review
After running the command, the files will be analyzed and you will be asked to choose one of the options:
y
- Approve the received file.n
- Reject the received file.v
iew - View the differences between the received and approved files. After selectingv
you will be asked which IDE you want to use to view the differences.
• Via approveResult property
If you want the result to be automatically saved after running the test, you need to use the approveResult
property in Options
:
void main() {
test('test JSON object', () {
final complexObject = {
'name': 'JsonTest',
'features': ['Testing', 'JSON'],
'version': 0.1,
};
Approvals.verifyAsJson(
complexObject,
options: const Options(
approveResult: true,
),
);
});
}
this will result in the following file
example_test.test_JSON_object.approved.txt
{
"name": "JsonTest",
"features": [
"Testing",
"JSON"
],
"version": 0.1
}
• Via file rename
You can just rename the .received
file to .approved
.
Reporters #
Reporters are the part of Approval Tests that launch diff tools when things do not match. They are the part of the system that makes it easy to see what has changed.
There are several reporters available in the package:
CommandLineReporter
- This is the default reporter, which will output the diff in the terminal.GitReporter
- This reporter will open the diff in the Git GUI.DiffReporter
- This reporter will open the Diff Tool in your IDE.- For Diff Reporter I using the default paths to the IDE, if something didn't work then you in the console see the expected correct path to the IDE and specify customDiffInfo. You can also contact me for help.
To use DiffReporter
you just need to add it to options
:
options: const Options(
reporter: const DiffReporter(),
),
📝 Examples #
I have provided a couple of small examples here to show you how to use the package.
There are more examples in the example
folder for you to explore. I will add more examples in the future.
Inside, in the gilded_rose
folder, there is an example of using ApprovalTests
to test the legacy code of Gilded Rose kata.
You can study it to understand how to use the package to test complex code.
And the verify_methods
folder has small examples of using different ApprovalTests
methods for different cases.
JSON example #
With verifyAsJson
, if you pass data models as JsonItem
, with nested other models as AnotherItem
and SubItem
, then you need to add an toJson
method to each model for the serialization to succeed.
void main() {
const jsonItem = JsonItem(
id: 1,
name: "JsonItem",
anotherItem: AnotherItem(id: 1, name: "AnotherItem"),
subItem: SubItem(
id: 1,
name: "SubItem",
anotherItems: [
AnotherItem(id: 1, name: "AnotherItem 1"),
AnotherItem(id: 2, name: "AnotherItem 2"),
],
),
);
test('verify model', () {
Approvals.verifyAsJson(
jsonItem,
options: const Options(
deleteReceivedFile:
true, // Automatically delete the received file after the test.
approveResult:
true, // Approve the result automatically. You can remove this property after the approved file is created.
),
);
});
}
this will result in the following file
verify_as_json_test.verify_model.approved.txt
{
"jsonItem": {
"id": 1,
"name": "JsonItem",
"subItem": {
"id": 1,
"name": "SubItem",
"anotherItems": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "AnotherItem 1"
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "AnotherItem 2"
}
]
},
"anotherItem": {
"id": 1,
"name": "AnotherItem"
}
}
}
❓ Which File Artifacts to Exclude from Source Control #
You must add any approved
files to your source control system. But received
files can change with any run and should be ignored. For Git, add this to your .gitignore
:
*.received.*
✉️ For More Information #
Questions? #
Ask me on Telegram: @yelmuratoff
.
Email: yelamanyelmuratov@gmail.com
Video Tutorials #
- Getting Started with ApprovalTests.Swift
- How to Verify Objects (and Simplify TDD)
- Verify Arrays and See Simple, Clear Diffs
- Write Parameterized Tests by Transforming Sequences
- Wrangle Legacy Code with Combination Approvals
You can also watch a series of short videos about using ApprovalTests in .Net on YouTube.
Podcasts #
Prefer learning by listening? Then you might enjoy the following podcasts:
Coverage #
🤝 Contributing #
Show some 💙 and star the repo to support the project! 🙌
The project is in the process of development and we invite you to contribute through pull requests and issue submissions. 👍
We appreciate your support. 🫰