app_preference 0.1.0

app_preference: ^0.1.0 copied to clipboard

0/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

OUT: Documenting app_preference... Discovering libraries... Linking elements... Precaching local docs for 625682 elements... Initialized dartdoc with 781 libraries Generating docs for library app_preference.dart from package:app_preference/app_preference.dart... Generating docs for library app_preference_plugin_interface.dart from package:app_preference/app_preference_plugin_interface.dart... Documented 2 public libraries in 82.0 seconds ERR: warning: ambiguous reexport of app_preference.AppPreferenceEnsuredExtension, canonicalization candidates: (app_preference, app_preference) -> app_preference (confidence 0.000) from app_preference.AppPreferenceEnsuredExtension: (file:///tmp/pana_ETFGMG/lib/src/app_preference.dart:206:11) app_preference: 1.260 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.2500)) app_preference: 1.260 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.2500)) Use {@canonicalFor app_preference.AppPreferenceEnsuredExtension} in the desired library's documentation to resolve the ambiguity and/or override dartdoc's decision, or structure your package so the reexport is less ambiguous. The symbol will still be referenced in all candidates -- this only controls the location where it will be written and which library will be displayed in navigation for the relevant pages. The flag [50 more lines]

0/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 6 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ Linux

• ✓ macOS

• ✓ Web

0/0 points: WASM compatibility

This package is compatible with runtime wasm, and will be rewarded additional points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://dart.dev/web/wasm for details.

40/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

Found 5 issues. Showing the first 2:

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.