10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: BSD-3-Clause.

0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

OUT: Documenting airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted... Discovering libraries... Linking elements... Precaching local docs for 644129 elements... Initialized dartdoc with 806 libraries Generating docs for library airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted.dart from package:airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted/airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted.dart... Generating docs for library airbridge_flutter_sdk.dart from package:airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted/airbridge_flutter_sdk.dart... Documented 2 public libraries in 26.1 seconds ERR: warning: ambiguous reexport of airbridge.Airbridge, canonicalization candidates: (airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted, airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted) -> airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted (confiden[...] from airbridge.Airbridge: (file:///tmp/pana_MPSDQA/lib/src/airbridge.dart:14:7) airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted: 1.210 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.2000)) airbridge_flutter_sdk_restricted: 1.210 - (_Reason.packageName (+1.000), _Reason.longName (+0.01000), _Reason.sharedNamePart (+0.2000)) Use {@canonicalFor airbridge.Airbridge} in the desired library's documentation to resolve the ambiguity and/or override dartdoc's decision, or structure your package so the reexport is less ambiguous. The symbol will still be referenced in all candidates -- this only controls the location where it will be written and which library will be displayed in navigation for the relevant pages. The flag [68 more lines]

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 2 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Android

• ✓ iOS

These platforms are not supported:

0/0 points: Swift Package Manager support

This package for iOS or macOS does not support the Swift Package Manager. It will not receive full points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://docs.flutter.dev/to/spm for details.

50/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

No dependencies.

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.