squadron 3.1.1 squadron: ^3.1.1 copied to clipboard
Multithreading and worker thread pool in Dart to offload CPU-bound and heavy I/O tasks to Isolate or Web Worker threads.
Multithreading and worker pools in Dart to offload CPU-bound or long running tasks and give your mobile and Web apps some air.
Features #
Worker
class: a base worker class managing a platform thread (Isolate or Web Worker) and the communication between
clients and workers.
WorkerPool<W>
class: a worker pool for W
workers. The number of workers is configurable as well as the degree of
concurrent workloads distributed to workers in the pool.
Getting Started #
Import squadron from your pubspec.yaml
file:
dependencies:
squadron: ^3.1.1
Usage #
First implement a service with sync or async methods you want to expose from workers. This approach enables reusing the code in different scenarios: unit tests, direct call from your app, or wrapped in a native Isolate or in a Web Worker.
The example below implements a SampleService
with a synchronous cpu()
method and an asynchronous io()
method.
The service inherits from WorkerService
and must implement the operations
map. This collection is essentially a
dispatcher used to map service commands with command actual handlers. Squadron uses this map in platform workers to
serve worker requests. The command handlers provided in this map are responsible for retrieving arguments from the
WorkerRequest
message and providing them to the service method.
class SampleService implements WorkerService {
Future io({required int milliseconds}) =>
Future.delayed(Duration(milliseconds: milliseconds));
void cpu({required int milliseconds}) {
final sw = Stopwatch()..start();
while (sw.elapsedMilliseconds < milliseconds) {/* cpu */}
}
// command ids
static const ioCommand = 1;
static const cpuCommand = 2;
// map of command ids to implementatons
@override
Map<int, CommandHandler> get operations => {
ioCommand: (WorkerRequest r) => io(milliseconds: r.args[0]),
cpuCommand: (WorkerRequest r) => cpu(milliseconds: r.args[0]),
};
}
This SampleService
can easily be used as a contract to implemented the Worker
. This worker can then be used for
Dart Isolates as well as Web Workers.
class SampleWorker extends Worker implements SampleService {
SampleWorker(dynamic entryPoint, {String? id, List args = const []})
: super(entryPoint, id: id, args: args);
@override
Future io({required int milliseconds}) =>
send(SampleService.ioCommand, [milliseconds]);
@override
Future cpu({required int milliseconds}) =>
send(SampleService.cpuCommand, [milliseconds]);
}
If the requirements above are met, the platform worker's main program can be implemented using the run()
function provided by Squadron 3. The first argument passed to this function is a WorkerService
initializer
responsible for creating the service to be used by the platform Worker. This function will be passed the first
WorkerRequest
to enable setting up the service. The second argument passed to run()
is optional and only
used in native scenarios where it must be set to the data passed to the Isolate
's main program.
- native implementation:
SampleWorker createVmSampleWorker() => SampleWorker(_main);
void _main(Map command) => run((startRequest) => SampleService(), command);
- browser implementation:
SampleWorker createJsSampleWorker() => SampleWorker('sample_worker_js.dart.js');
void main() => run((startRequest) => SampleService());
Using a WorkerPool
, you are now able to distribute your workloads:
var pool = WorkerPool(createVmSampleWorker, maxWorkers: 4, maxParallel: 2); /* native version */
// var pool = WorkerPool(createJsSampleWorker, maxWorkers: 4, maxParallel: 2); /* browser version */
await pool.start();
var n = 42;
var cpuResult = await pool.execute((w) => w.cpu(milliseconds: n));
var ioResult = await pool.execute((w) => w.io(milliseconds: n));
Remarks on Isolates / Web Workers #
While Isolates
enable multithreading in Dart applications, several aspects must be taken into account:
-
Creating an
Isolate
can be an expensive process. -
Isolate
threads are still based on an event loop, processing asynchronous tasks/callbacks one by one. -
Isolate
s do not share memory; in particular, global contexts are not shared acrossIsolate
s and may have to be initialized multiple times thus increasing the application's memory footprint and startup time. -
Communicating with an
Isolate
invoves marshalling data in and out; theoretically, only primitive types (num
,String
,bool
,null
...),List
/Map
of primitive types and some specific types likeSendPort
are supported. However, object instances may be sent acrossIsolate
s on some platforms, e.g. the Dart Native platform (instances will still be copied).
Web Workers have similar characteristics. Only primitive types and objects implementing Transferable can be sent across Web Worker boundaries.
Scaling Options #
Squadron pools manage a collection of workers to avoid the cost of creating a new platform worker each time.
Squadron also implements a simple load-balancing mechanism and posts new tasks to workers that are most
available (i.e. those with the minimum workload
, provided workload
< maxParallel
). Tasks in Squadron
do not have a priority and will be handled in the order they were received.
Depending on the type of processing, scaling tasks with Squadron can be achieved horizontally (adding new workers) or vertically (distributing more tasks to workers).
-
For pure CPU-bound tasks, e.g. image/video or other heavy data processing, increasing the
maxParallel
pool option is likely to NOT yield any benefit for performance. If the event loop is already busy executing a task, subsequent task requests posted to theWorker
will not be handled before the executing task is complete. As a result, CPU-bound tasks will be queued and scaling CPU workloads can only be achieved by adding more workers to the pool (horizontal scaling). -
For I/O bound tasks, performance benefits are less obvious. However, if processing requires many I/O operations, offloading such tasks to a worker pool is likely to be beneficial because I/O callbacks will be registered with the platform worker's event loop. This scenario can be interesting in Web application back-ends to make the main event loop more available for other incoming requests -- simple requests e.g. CRUD operations can be fully handled by the main event loop while more complex, long-running, I/O-bound tasks will be processed off the Web app's main event loop. Scaling such tasks can be achieved by increasing the
maxParallel
(vertical scaling) ormaxWorkers
(horizontal scaling) pool options. In I/O scenarios, vertical scaling should be preferred.
Worker Cooperation #
It is possible to implement some kind of worker cooperation and support more complex scenarios.
For instance, the fact that Isolate
s and Web Workers do not share memory means it may be cumbersome to implement
a local, in-memory cache at worker level. Each worker would have their own copy of the cache, making expiration and
update propagation difficult to implement.
As a workaround, it is possible to implement a cache worker as a Singleton (no pooling) and to share the worker's
Channel
across other workers (Channel
objects can be sent across platform workers via the serialize()
method).
An example is provided in cache_worker.dart
. To access the cache API seamlessly, an abstract class is first
defined:
abstract class Cache {
FutureOr<dynamic> get(dynamic key);
FutureOr<bool> containsKey(dynamic key);
FutureOr set(dynamic key, dynamic value, {Duration? timeToLive});
FutureOr<CacheStat> getStats();
}
A cache service is then implemented (internal details skipped, please refer to the example source code). Note that
the CacheService
implementation can be synchronous.
class CacheService implements Cache, WorkerService {
@override
dynamic get(dynamic key) {
// retrieve the value associated for the specified key
// return null if key is not in cache or if the key has expired
}
@override
bool containsKey(dynamic key) {
// use get() as it implements the expiration logic
final data = get(key);
return data != null;
}
@override
void set(dynamic key, dynamic value, {Duration? timeToLive}) {
// cache the value with the specified key and TTL
}
@override
CacheStat getStats() {
// return cache stats
}
// command ids
static const getOperation = 1;
static const containsOperation = 2;
static const setOperation = 3;
static const statsOperation = 4;
// command handlers
Map<int, CommandHandler> get operations => {
getOperation: (WorkerRequest r) => get(r.args[0]),
containsOperation: (WorkerRequest r) => containsKey(r.args[0]),
setOperation: (WorkerRequest r) => set(r.args[0], r.args[1],
timeToLive: (r.args[2] == null) ? null : Duration(microseconds: r.args[2])),
statsOperation: (WorkerRequest r) => getStats().serialize()
};
}
The CacheWorker
is easy:
class CacheWorker extends Worker implements Cache {
CacheWorker(dynamic entryPoint, {String? id, List args = const []})
: super(entryPoint, id: id, args: args);
@override
Future<dynamic> get(dynamic key) => send(CacheService.getOperation, [key]);
@override
Future<bool> containsKey(dynamic key) =>
send(CacheService.containsOperation, [key]);
@override
Future set(dynamic key, dynamic value, {Duration? timeToLive}) {
assert(value != null); // null means not in cache; cannot store null
return send(CacheService.setOperation, [key, value, timeToLive?.inMicroseconds]);
}
@override
Future<CacheStat> getStats() async =>
CacheStat.deserialize(await send(CacheService.statsOperation));
}
Finally, a cache client is implemented to proxy calls from other workers to the CacheWorker
. This CacheClient
can be constructed with a Channel
that will be obtained from the CacheWorker
.
class CacheClient implements Cache {
CacheClient(this._remote);
final Channel _remote;
@override
Future<dynamic> get(dynamic key) =>
_remote.sendRequest(CacheService.getOperation, [key]);
@override
Future<bool> containsKey(dynamic key) =>
_remote.sendRequest(CacheService.containsOperation, [key]);
@override
Future set(dynamic key, dynamic value, {Duration? timeToLive}) {
assert(value != null); // null means not in cache; cannot store null
return _remote.sendRequest(
CacheService.setOperation, [key, value, timeToLive?.inMicroseconds]);
}
@override
Future<CacheStat> getStats() async {
=> CacheStat.deserialize(
await _remote.sendRequest(CacheService.statsOperation, []));
}
Note how getStats()
implementations require serialization/deserialization of the CacheStat
object. This is
necessary to cross platform worker boundaries.
class OtherService implements WorkerService {
OtherService([this._cache]);
final Cache? _cache;
// some service method
Future<int> compute(int n) async {
// check cache
int? result = await _cache?.get(n);
if (result != null) {
// cache hit
return n;
}
// otherwise compute
// ...
// finally, cache (dont await) and return
cache?.set(n, result);
return result!;
}
// some command ids
static const computeCommand = 1;
@override
Map<int, CommandHandler> get operations => {
// the comand handlers for the command ids
computeCommand: (r) => compute(r.args[0])
};
}
The OtherWorker
implementation is straightforward:
class OtherWorker extends Worker implements OtherService {
OtherWorker(dynamic entryPoint, {String? id, List args = const []})
: super(entryPoint, id: id, args: args);
@override
Future<int> compute(int n) => send<int>(OtherService.computeCommand, [n]);
// other proxy service methods...
@override
final Cache? _cache = null;
}
The platform worker assembles everything. It is essentially the same as above, with some extra initialization code
to set up a CacheClient
.
To create a CacheClient
from within the platform worker, the CacheWorker
's Channel
must be somehow passed to
the OtherWorker
. This is done using the share()
and the serialize()
methods provided by Channel
. These
methods will return an opaque object that can be safely sent across workers and deserialized to recreate a
Channel
, thereby bridging the gap between the OtherService
instances and the CacheService
Singleton.
OtherWorker createOtherWorker([CacheWorker? cache]) =>
OtherWorker(_main, args: [cache?.channel?.share().serialize()]);
void _main(Map command) {
run((startRequest) {
final cacheEndPoint = startRequest.args.isEmpty
? null
: Channel.deserialize(startRequest.args[0]);
Cache? cache = (cacheEndPoint == null) ? null : CacheClient(cacheEndPoint);
return OtherService(cache);
}, command);
}
The application's main program is responsible for:
- setting up the
CacheWorker
Singleton - setting up a pool of
OtherWorker
s and making sure the worker factory function receives theCacheWorker
Singleton.
final cacheWorker = CacheWorker();
await cacheWorker.start();
final pool = WorkerPool(() => createOtherWorker(cacheWorker), minWorkers: 2, maxWorkers: 5);
await pool.start();
Architecture Diagram
+-----------------------+
+--> | CacheWorker singleton | <--+
| +-----------------------+ |
| |
+-------------------+ | +----------------+ (4)
| main program | --(1)--+ +----> | otherWorker #1 | |
| ---------------- | | | -------------- | |
(2) OtherWorker pool | --(3)--+ | | cacheClient #1 | ---|
+-------------------+ | | +----------------+ |
+----| |
| +----------------+ |
+----> | otherWorker #2 | |
| -------------- | |
| cacheClient #2 | ---+
+----------------+
1: the main program first spawns a CacheWorker
2: the main program creates a pool of OtherWorkers, making sure the CacheWorker Singleton is advertized to OtherWorkers when they are created
3: the pool creates new OtherWorkers as workload builds up, instantiating cache clients bound to the CacheWorker's Channel
4: OtherWorkers query the CacheWorker via their local CacheClient to avoid expensive computations that have been done already
Task Cancellation #
Tasks registered with the worker pool may be cancelled by calling pool.cancel()
. A CancelledException
will be
raised (for value tasks: the future completes with an error) or emitted (for streaming tasks: the stream will emit
an error) for each pending task. Tasks still pending will fail immediately; tasks already executing when the
cancel()
method is called will either complete (value task) or emit an exception (streaming tasks).
final future = pool.execute((w) => w.computeData());
final stream = pool.stream((w) => w.streamData());
// no async suspension means Squadron could not schedule any task
// as a result this cancellation request will cancel both tasks
pool.cancel();
stream.listen(
(value) => print('received value: $value'), // will not be called
onError: (e) => print('received error: $e')); // receives a CancelledException
final result = await future; // throws a CancelledException
final future = pool.execute((w) => w.computeData());
final stream = pool.stream((w) => w.streamData());
// asynchronous suspension gives Squadron a chance to schedule some tasks
Future(() => null);
// depending on concurrency settings, this cancellation request should cancel the stream task
// however the value task should have been scheduled and should complete
pool.cancel();
stream.listen(
(value) => print('received value: $value'), // may be called for a few values
onError: (e) => print('received error: $e')); // will receive a CancelledException
final result = await future; // should get the task's result
It is also possible to schedule and cancel individual tasks, eg.:
final valueTask = pool.scheduleTask((w) => w.computeData());
final streamTask = pool.scheduleStream((w) => w.streamData());
// no async suspension means Squadron could not schedule any task
streamTask.cancel(); // or pool.cancel(streamTask)
stream.listen(
(value) => print('received value: $value'), // will not be called
onError: (e) => print('received error: $e')); // receives a CancelledException
valueTask.cancel(); // or pool.cancel(valueTask)
final result = await valueTask.value; // throws a CancelledException
final valueTask = pool.scheduleTask((w) => w.computeData());
final streamTask = pool.scheduleStream((w) => w.streamData());
// asynchronous suspension gives Squadron a chance to schedule some tasks
Future(() => null);
streamTask.cancel(); // or pool.cancel(streamTask)
stream.listen(
(value) => print('received value: $value'), // may be called for a few values
onError: (e) => print('received error: $e')); // will receive a CancelledException
valueTask.cancel(); // or pool.cancel(valueTask)
final result = await valueTask.value; // should get the task's result
Worker Monitoring #
Monitoring workers in a pool can be done with a simple timer. For instance, to stop workers after a given idle period:
// install worker monitor
final timer = Timer.periodic(refreshDuration, (timer) {
pool.stop((w) => w.idleTime > maxIdle);
});
Please note that some idle workers may remain alive, depending on the minWorker
pool option.
To stop all workers, simply call the pool's stop()
method with no predicate.
// stops all workers
pool.stop();
All workers will be stopped as soon as all pending tasks have been processed. Of course, it is possible to cancel pending tasks before stopping the worker pool.
// cancels pending tasks and stops all workers
pool.cancel();
pool.stop();
The pool will not accept new tasks unless it is restarted with pool.start()
.