lodim 0.1.1+1

Fixed-point pixel accurate 2D geometry with minimal approximations.

lodim

Fast and pixel accurate fixed-point 2D geometry with minimal approximations.

Optimal for the following use cases:

• 2D game development that uses tile-based or grid-based rendering.
• Graphic rendering of pixel art or other fixed-point rasterized graphics.
• Fixed-point geometry for performance or consistency reasons.

Features

Use lodim to quickly work with 2D geometry in a fixed-point space:

• Fixed-point: All values and results are always integers.
• Fast: AOT and JIT benchmarked on the Dart VM.
• Pixel accurate: Minimal¹ ambiguity or hidden rounding errors.
• Ergonomics: Familiar API to dart:ui (and similar) for ease of use.
• Cross-platform: Works on all Dart platforms, including Flutter and web.

Usage

Just add a dependency in your pubspec.yaml or run the following command:

dart pub add lodim

If you've used another 2D geometry library, such as dart:ui from Flutter, you will find lodim to be very similar. Work with similar types such as Pos (i.e. Offset) and Rect:

// Creates a (x, y) position.
final pos = Pos(10, 20);

// Creates a rectangle.
final rect = Rect.fromLTWH(0, 0, 100, 100);

Take advantage of tested and benchmarked common operations:

// Rotate a position by 135 degrees counter-clockwise.
final rotated = pos.rotate45(-3);

// Get the intersection of two rectangles.
final intersection = rect.intersect(a, b);

Use built-in algorithms for common tasks, or define your own:

// Determine the distance between two positions.
final distance = pos1.distanceTo(pos2);

// Use another algorithm to determine the distance or define your own.
final manhattan = pos1.distanceTo(pos2, using: manhattan);

// Draw a line from one position to another.
final line = pos1.lineTo(pos2);

// Use your own algorithm to draw a line.
final custom = pos1.lineTo(pos2, using: someOtherAlgorithm);

Benchmarks

To run the benchmarks, run:

dart run benchmark/benchmark.dart

# Or, to use AOT:
dart compile exe benchmark/benchmark.dart
./benchmark/benchmark.exe

# Or, to profile using devtools:
dart run --pause-isolates-on-start --observe benchmark/benchmark.dart

In local benchmarks on a M2 Macbook Pro, compared to [baseline]² code.

JIT:

Benchmark	lodim	Baseline	Delta
10k allocations positions	479.8 us	362.9 us	-25%
10k euclidian distance	138.3 us	153.5 us	+11%
10k rotations in 45° steps	6875.8 us	13658.7 us	+98%
10k lines drawn	1340049.5	-	-

AOT:

Benchmark	lodim	Baseline	Delta
10k allocations positions	342.7 us	463.9 us	+35%
10k euclidian distance	139.7 us	132.7 us	-5%
10k rotations in 45° steps	5858.2 us	11708.0 us	+100%
10k lines drawn	1333651.0 us	-	-

tl;dr: lodim is faster than baseline code, using both JIT and AOT. Specializing based on fixed-point geometry allows for optimizations that are not possible with general-purpose code, such as jump-table based rotations.

Contributing

To run the tests, run:

dart test

To check code coverage locally, run:

dart tool/coverage.dart

To preview dartdoc output locally, run:

dart tool/dartdoc.dart