debug

The observer and the global settings of the package. Everything on this page is static and lives in ScopeConfig, so the usual place to set it up is main(), before runApp.

The observer

The package is silent until it is given somewhere to speak. ScopeConfig.observer is null by default; assign a ScopeObserver and every scope in the application starts reporting through it.

void main() {
  ScopeConfig.observer = const ScopePrintObserver();

  runApp(const App());
}

ScopeObserver is a class of twelve methods, every one of them empty. A subclass overrides what it wants and inherits the silence of the rest, so an observer that only cares about failures is one method long:

final class CrashReporter extends ScopeObserver {
  const CrashReporter();

  @override
  void onError(
    ScopeObservable target,
    ScopePhase phase,
    ScopeErrorRoute route,
    Object error,
    StackTrace? stackTrace,
  ) {
    // Any other route: somebody else has the failure, or it is no failure.
    if (route != ScopeErrorRoute.observer) return;

    crashlytics.recordError(
      error,
      stackTrace,
      reason: '${target.debugLabel}: ${phase.name}',
    );
  }
}

It forwards only what route says goes nowhere else. The rest is somebody else's: FlutterError.onError or the zone has it, and the crash reporting of an application usually listens there already, or the code that called close() is handed it. Forwarding that as well would report it twice. What says cancellation is no failure at all. See "onError and ScopeErrorRoute" below.

ScopeObserver is an ordinary class: a subclass needs no class modifier, and a test double can implement it. Extend it for an ordinary observer so that new empty hooks are inherited.

ScopeConfig.observer holds one observer, and wanting two is ordinary — the one above beside ScopePrintObserver while you are working. That is ScopeCompositeObserver:

ScopeConfig.observer = const ScopeCompositeObserver([
  ScopePrintObserver(),
  CrashReporter(),
]);

It is part of the package rather than something to write by hand, and that is the point of it. The empty hooks above are what keep an ordinary observer compiling when a new one is added later — and a delegate is the one subclass that gains nothing from them: the new hook would arrive with the empty implementation of the base, and every observer behind the delegate would stop hearing that event without a word from anywhere. This one is written with the class it forwards. An observer that throws does not stop the ones after it either; the failure is reported and the rest are asked.

The hooks are called synchronously, from the build, the initialization or the teardown they belong to. That is what makes them useful — the order the lines come out in is the order the package did the work — and it is also why one that throws is caught rather than left to escape; see "When the observer itself fails" below.

The twelve hooks

hook	what happened
`onInit(target)`	an initialization has begun
`onStepStarted(target, path)`	one step of it has begun
`onProgress(target, progress)`	one step of it is done
`onReady(target)`	it finished successfully
`onCancelled(target)`	it was cancelled before it finished
`onDispose(target)`	a teardown has begun
`onDisposalStepStarted(target, path)`	one step of it has begun
`onDisposalProgress(target, path)`	one step of it is done
`onDisposed(target)`	a teardown has finished
`onError(target, phase, route, error, stackTrace)`	something failed
`onTimeout(target, what, error, stackTrace)`	a bounded wait expired
`onTrace(target, message)`	a step of the machinery below the lifecycle

Four of them are the dependency container's steps — onStepStarted and onProgress for an initialization, onDisposalStepStarted and onDisposalProgress for a teardown — and they are two pairs: an entry and an exit for each half of its lifecycle. Both entries are sent from inside the step and before it awaits anything, which is what makes the pairs worth reading — see "The last entry with no exit" below. onProgress is the one of the four that a scope sends as well, on its own account; the other three come from a container and nowhere else.

Who sends them

A family with no initialization phase of its own — ScopeWidget, ScopeModel, ScopeNotifier, AsyncScopeCoordinator — reports onInit when its element is initialized, and onDispose/onDisposed as a pair around its teardown. That is all such a scope has to say when it works; one whose init() throws says onError with ScopePhase.initialization and nothing else. Before this reporting existed it said nothing at all: its lifecycle was visible only to a debugger.

A family that runs an initialization — everything built on the asynchronous element: AsyncScope, AsyncDataScope, AsyncControllerScope, LiteScope and Scope — reports that phase instead, in the detail the phase has: onInit, then onProgress per step, then onReady or onCancelled; and, on the way out, onDispose and onDisposed. Nothing reports both halves — the structural pair is suppressed for these families, so a LiteScope produces one onInit, not two.

Three things that order does not say, and all three matter to an observer that pairs events up:

onCancelled does not always follow an onInit. A scope still queued for its scopeKey when it is taken off the tree never started an initialization of its own, so there was nothing to announce: its whole recording is onCancelled, onDispose, onDisposed. The cancellation genuinely happens in the queue, before the initialization this family would otherwise report;
onDispose and onDisposed always come as a pair. onDispose is sent by every teardown, including one of a scope that never became ready and has nothing of its own to release, and onDisposed is sent even when the teardown failed — after the onError that says so, not instead of it. So a leak counter or a span tracker that opens on one and closes on the other stays balanced whichever way the scope went;
for a family with no phase of its own, that same pair requires the onInit that would open it. ScopeWidget, ScopeModel, ScopeNotifier and AsyncScopeCoordinator report onDispose/onDisposed only for an element whose init() succeeded; one that threw, or never ran, reports neither half — nothing was announced as open, so nothing is announced as closed, even though the element still tears itself down internally. This is the one point where the two kinds of family differ: the phase-reporting families above can still close a teardown that opened with no onInit at all, as the previous bullet shows. The failure itself is not lost either way — init() is the one hook both kinds run before anything else, and a throw from it reports onError with ScopePhase.initialization for both.

The container of automatic dependencies of a Scope reports its own lifecycle under its own label, beside the scope that owns it: onInit, then onStepStarted/onProgress per dependency initialized, onReady or onCancelled, and then onDispose, onDisposalStepStarted/onDisposalProgress per dependency released, onDisposed.

A single dependency sends nothing but onTrace: the two points where it handles an error of its own. The four step events above are its steps but the container's events — they arrive under the container's label, which is the label an observer that filters by target is already holding.

The last entry with no exit

onStepStarted is sent from inside the step, before the initializer awaits anything, and onProgress for that same step is sent once it is done. So the recording of an initialization that hung ends with the path of the step it hung in:

scopo | AppDeps(#1a2b7) | initialize…
scopo | AppDeps(#1a2b7) | initialize storage/db…
scopo | AppDeps(#1a2b7) | progress: storage/db (1/3)
scopo | AppDeps(#1a2b7) | initialize network/session…

network/session was entered and never came back. Nothing else in the recording says so: progress counts what finished, and the step after storage/db is only guessable for a sequential group — a concurrent one has several steps in flight at once, and the number of the last completed one says nothing about which of them is stuck.

onDisposalStepStarted and onDisposalProgress are the same pair for the teardown, and are read the same way.

Two things the pairs promise, and one they do not:

the path of the two halves is the same string. It is assembled by the same groups, through the same code, on the way up — so path can be used as the key of a map that opens on the entry and closes on the exit;
a release is announced only when there is one to run. A dependency that registered nothing, or only an unmount, has no asynchronous teardown, and a bare entry for it would read as a release that hung. It is walked past in silence instead, so an unmatched entry always means what it looks like;
a dependency of your own making announces no entry. One that implements ScopeDependency rather than being built by dep, sequential or concurrent has nowhere to take the mark from. Both of its exits still arrive: onProgress travels the onStep callback of init(), which is the part of the contract such a dependency does implement, and its release is announced for it — by the group above it as the path comes through, or, for such a dependency standing as the whole tree, by the container's own callback. That last case is the one place the guarantee below stops: a tree whose root is yours and whose disposal someone else drives is not announced at all, because the container receives no callback from that walk.

An entry has three ends, and only two of them are events: the exit, an onError carrying ScopePhase.disposal, and silence. The failure arrives right behind the entry it ends, so a release that threw is never mistaken for one that hung — and an entry with nothing behind it means the step is still running, or never came back.

The disposal pair holds whoever drives the walk. Disposing of the tree by hand is a supported thing to do, and a container can also join a walk already running rather than start a second one; in both cases the container is not the one receiving the paths. onDisposalProgress is sent when the disposer has returned, not when the path reaches a callback, so the pair survives all three. The disposal walk cannot be cancelled; every release is awaited.

Unlike onProgress, an entry is not passed on to the scope that owns the container — see the note at the end of the section below.

What `onProgress` carries

progress is an Object? because the two sources report different things, each already typed on its own terms:

from a scope, the value its initialization reported as progress: whatever the application passed to ctx.progress — a String on the splash screen, in most of them;
from a dependency container that is initializing, a ScopeAutoDependenciesProgress, which carries the path of the dependency just built along with name, number, total and value. A Scope whose container builds its dependencies passes the same value on, so it arrives twice: once under the container's label and once under the scope's.

Wrapping the two in a common type would have meant inventing a third.

A disposal is not one of them. It used to be — the bare String path of the dependency just released arrived here too — and that left one hook meaning two different things at two different points of the lifecycle, told apart by the type of a value. It has onDisposalProgress of its own now. See "Coming from 0.12.x" below.

The entry marks arrive once, not twice. onProgress reaches the scope as well as the container because the container forwards it to ctx.progress. onStepStarted and onDisposalStepStarted travel a channel of their own — that is what lets them be sent from inside a step rather than after it — so they arrive under the container's label only. An observer that wants them beside a scope reads target: the container reports next to the scope that owns it, under a label of its own.

`onError` and `ScopePhase`

phase says what was running when the failure happened:

`ScopePhase`	what was running
`initialization`	the initialization: the `init()` hook or the phase
`initializationCancellation`	cancelling an initialization still running
`build`	a build of the scope's own subtree
`preparationForDisposal`	the synchronous half of the teardown
`unmount`	the `onUnmount` hook
`disposal`	any `dispose`: `disposeScope`, a dependency's, a controller's, a `ScopeModel`'s
`abandonedWait`	a wait that failed after its waiter was gone

The enum can grow, so a switch over it in your own code wants a default branch.

build is the one phase you would have seen something of without an observer: Flutter's build error boundary answers a failing build with an ErrorWidget. The report is added to that rather than put in its place — the ErrorWidget still appears, and the failure also arrives through the channel the rest of the lifecycle arrives through. The five buildOn* branches, ScopeWidgetBase.build, ScopeModel.build and the build of ScopeState and LiteScopeState all report under this phase.

ScopeState and LiteScopeState also report failures of initStateAsync and onInitialized under initialization, with their owning scope as the target and the original zone or Flutter error path preserved. Ordinary Flutter hooks such as initState, didChangeDependencies, didUpdateWidget, deactivate and activate remain outside this observer channel.

A widget that is not a scope does not: ListenableSelector and the views of ScopeNotifier build like any other widget, and onError needs a ScopeObservable to name as the target. Their builds stay where they were — inside the build error boundary, and nowhere else.

A teardown that fails more than once reports every failure, not the first alone. A Scope tears its state down before its dependencies, and each half is guarded on its own, so both can fail, and onError carries them both.

Where such a failure goes besides the observer depends on whether anybody is left to be handed it. Of the failures thrown by the scope's own teardown steps, including a hand-written ScopeDependencies.dispose, the first reaches whoever asked for the teardown — close(), say — and the rest are reported. Nothing at all is raised while the framework is taking a scope off the tree: that caller is a loop unmounting a whole batch of elements with no boundary around any one of them, over a list it has already cleared, so a throw there would cost every scope behind this one the teardown it is owed. Both channels still carry the failure; neither of them is the throw.

ScopeAutoDependencies.dispose does not rethrow a failure of its tree. Each failed disposal step is reported through FlutterError.reportError where it fails, once, and its onError carries the failure named with the path of the step and says ScopeErrorRoute.flutterError — so a tree where two leaves failed gives two reports. A step that fails with Cancelled says ScopeErrorRoute.cancellation and is not reported. A successful await close() therefore does not prove that every automatic dependency was released successfully. Every failed step is available in flattenDependenciesWithErrors() and through onError. A group that fails before it reaches any child — a dependency of your own making whose disposalRequired throws — reports that as a failed step of its own, named with the path of the group: once, with ScopeErrorRoute.flutterError, whether or not another failure of the walk came first.

`onError` and `ScopeErrorRoute`

An observer that sends every onError to a crash reporter reports many failures twice. A failure nobody is left to be handed — a teardown that failed after the scope left the tree, a build that threw — is also reported through FlutterError.reportError, and the crash reporting of an application usually listens at FlutterError.onError as well. route says where else the failure goes, and it is known by the time onError is called:

`ScopeErrorRoute`	who else has the failure	for instance
`observer`	nobody: the observer is the only one told	an `initScope` that threw, a `Cancelled` included, or an `initDependencies` that threw; a failure of a child job that the body caught, or that nobody read
`flutterError`	`FlutterError.onError`, through a report of the package or of Flutter's build error boundary	a build or a synchronous `init()` that threw; a teardown failure with no caller left; a late release; a failed cleanup, callback or late work of the initialization job
`zone`	the zone the scope runs in, as an uncaught error	an `initStateAsync` of a `LiteScopeState` or a `ScopeState` that threw; an `AsyncScope` that failed before its initialization started
`caller`	the code that called `close()`: its `Future` completes with the failure	the first failure of a teardown that `close()` began
`cancellation`	nobody, since it is not a failure	a `Cancelled` thrown by a cleanup or a callback of the initialization job, or by a disposal step of a dependency tree; an error that `Job.isCancellationError` names on a cancelled job

So a crash reporter forwards ScopeErrorRoute.observer and nothing else, as CrashReporter above does, and each failure is reported once. caller is your own code: whatever called close() is handed the failure, and reports it if it wants to. The enum can grow too, and a switch over it wants a default branch.

Leaving ScopeConfig.observer at null hides no failure completely. An initialization that failed still shows in buildOnError, and a failure of a child job that nobody read, which goes to the observer alone while there is one, is reported through FlutterError.reportError instead.

The route is final when onError is called, and in seven cases it still does not tell the whole story:

a close() that joins a teardown the tree began. A scope taken off the tree has begun its teardown, so the first failure of that teardown says flutterError and is reported. A close() called on the scope after that shares the teardown, and the Future it returns completes with the same failure. Code that reports what its close() throws reports that one a second time;
a dependency tree disposed of by hand. root.dispose() on the tree of a ScopeAutoDependencies walks it the way the container does: every failed step is reported and says flutterError, the first one included — and root.dispose() also throws that first one to you. It has been reported already, so the code that drives the walk need not report what it throws;
a Cancelled thrown by a teardown hook of a scope, such as disposeScope or onUnmount. It says flutterError and is reported, as any other failure of that stage is. A crash reporter that listens at FlutterError.onError receives it as a failure;
ignoreFailure() called late on a cancelled child. A child job whose body fails after the child was cancelled says flutterError, and the report comes once the child has ended. A child.ignoreFailure() your code calls in between — after the failure, before the child ends — takes that report away. The failure then reaches the observer alone, under a route that says otherwise, and a crash reporter that forwards observer never sees it;
two failures that end alike, and two routes. When the body of an initialization fails while a cleanup it registered is still running, and the scope is taken off the tree before that cleanup ends, the cancellation takes over the outcome: the failure then says flutterError, with ScopePhase.initializationCancellation, and is reported — or cancellation, and is not, when Job.isCancellationError names it. A failure of a child job that the body let out, covered by the cancellation the same way, says observer, with ScopePhase.initialization: the observer heard it from the child before anything was settled, was told that it goes nowhere else, and it is not reported, unless the body takes it up again after its cancellation (the next case). Forwarded by route, each is reported once — but a log or a test that expects both in FlutterError.onError finds only the first there;
one object that fails twice. The package tells failures apart by identity, so a const exception — throw const NetworkUnavailable() — or a cached error thrown again is one failure to it, however many times it is thrown. The observer hears it once, with the first route. When a failure of a child job said observer and the same object then fails a cleanup, a callback or late work of the initialization job, or the body itself after the scope was taken off the tree — reading the child, or throwing again what it caught — whether it is the same failure thrown again or a second one, it is reported through FlutterError.reportError as well, and the observer is not told again. A duplicate is better than a loss: a crash reporter that forwards observer and listens at FlutterError.onError gets that failure from both;
an observer is there even when it does nothing. A failure of a child job that nobody read says observer and is kept out of FlutterError whenever ScopeConfig.observer is set, short of the case above: the package does not look behind it, and an observer that drops what it hears keeps the failure out the same way, and then nobody has it. A ScopeCompositeObserver with nobody inside is told apart: the package takes it for no observer at all. With ScopeConfig.observer at null the failure is reported, and so it is when the onError of the observer throws: that observer has heard nothing. A ScopeCompositeObserver one of whose observers throws has heard nothing either: the failure is reported, and an observer in it that did hear it and also listens at FlutterError.onError gets it twice.

What `onTimeout` covers

Every bounded wait reports an expiry through the observer — all seven of them — and what names the one that expired:

`what`	the wait
`access to its scopeKey`	a scope queued behind the previous one on the same key
`its own teardown`	a scope waiting out `disposeScope`
`its state to be disposed of`	the first half of that wait on a `Scope`, which has two
`its dependencies to be disposed of`	and the second half
`its initialization to be cancelled`	a teardown that arrived while the initialization was still running
`its controller to be released`	an `AsyncControllerScope` giving back a controller its own initialization never handed over
`its child scopes`	a parent waiting for the scopes below it
`the disposal`	a dependency container waiting for the tree it built to be released

Seven rows and eight labels: a Scope has two steps behind disposeScope and bounds each of them, so it reports one of the middle two rather than its own teardown, which is what every other family reports.

error is the TimeoutException the report carries: the scope's name, the limit, and — for the two waits that queue behind something — what was still pending when that limit ran out, the entries ahead in the queue of a scopeKey or the children a parent never saw finish. It is everything the package knows about the expiry, so an observer that logs it needs nothing beside it.

An expiry is never announced through the observer alone. The first two of these also reach onScopeKeyTimeout and onWaitForChildrenTimeout — the scope's own callbacks — and every one of them is reported through FlutterError.reportError, unless a callback of yours takes that place or the application switched those reports off. Neither the callback nor the switch touches this event: the observer is what the package says about itself, not your error handling.

What `onTrace` covers

Everything below the lifecycle: preparing for initialization and for disposal, the scopeKey queue (waiting for access, obtaining it, giving it up, leaving), waiting for child scopes, waiting for an initialization to finish, the two points inside a dependency where an error is handled, and messages the initialization sends through ctx.log.

A scope produces a dozen of these where it produces one of everything else, which is why ScopePrintObserver leaves them off. They are what to turn on when a scope hangs, initializes in an unexpected order, or is disposed of too late — and nothing else.

Who the event is about

The first argument of every hook is a ScopeObservable, and its only member is the name the source calls itself by:

source	`debugLabel`
a scope element, any family	`CounterScope(#4e0b7)` or `CounterScope(cart)`
the container of dependencies	`AppDependencies(#25f53)`
a single dependency	its declared name; `[group]` if the group is anonymous

A tag is therefore the cheapest way to tell two scopes of the same type apart in the output — and the only way to get a label that is the same on every run, since the short hash is not.

ScopeObservable is deliberately not implemented by ScopeDependencies or ScopeDependency: those are yours to implement, and a new required member on them would break the code that already does. Only the classes of the package produce events, so only they carry the marker.

An observer that wants one kind of source narrows with a pattern rather than a cast:

final class ScopeAnalytics extends ScopeObserver {
  const ScopeAnalytics();

  @override
  void onReady(ScopeObservable target) {
    if (target case ScopeInheritedElement(:final widget)) {
      analytics.logEvent('scope_ready', {'type': '${widget.runtimeType}'});
    }
  }
}

ScopePrintObserver

The observer that comes with the package writes a line per event:

ScopeConfig.observer = const ScopePrintObserver();

scopo | CounterScope(#4e0b7) | initialize…
scopo | AppDependencies(#25f53) | progress: prefs (1/2)
scopo | CounterScope(#4e0b7) | initialized
scopo | CounterScope(#4e0b7) | initialization failed: Exception: no network

The shape is scopo | <label> | <what happened>. A failure adds : <error>, and the stack trace on a line of its own when the event carries one.

The phase of a failure is spelled out as English rather than as the name of the ScopePhase value: initialization failed, initialization cancellation failed, build failed, preparation for disposal failed, unmount failed, disposal failed, and — the one that does not fit that shape — an abandoned wait ended in a failure.

Two parameters, both optional:

ScopeConfig.observer = ScopePrintObserver(
  output: debugPrint,
  trace: true,
);

output is where a line goes; print by default. trace decides whether onTrace is printed at all, and is false by default — which is the whole of what a level threshold used to do here.

The constructor is const, and the observer above is not: debugPrint is a variable Flutter lets you replace, so it is not a constant. const works with the default output and with a function of your own that is one.

When the observer itself fails

The observer is your code, and the package calls it from a build, from an initialization and from a teardown. A hook that threw out of one of those would take the scope with it: a scope that never built its ready branch, or a teardown that stopped halfway with a scopeKey still held.

So every call goes through a guard. A hook that throws is reported through FlutterError.reportError with library: 'scopo' — a red screen in debug, FlutterError.onError in release — and whatever was reporting the event goes on. Nothing is swallowed, and nothing is retried.

The same guard refuses re-entry. An observer that produces a scope event while it is being notified — one that mounts a scope from inside a hook, say — would otherwise recurse without end; the second notification is refused and reported, once per refused call, and the first one runs to its end.

Timeouts

Four kinds of wait in the scope lifecycle are bounded by a timeout, and all four defaults live in ScopeConfig:

ScopeConfig.defaultScopeKeyTimeout — how long a scope waits for its scopeKey to be released by the previous owner;
ScopeConfig.defaultInitCancellationTimeout — how long a teardown waits for the initialization to be cancelled;
ScopeConfig.defaultDisposeScopeTimeout — how long a teardown waits for disposeScope, the scope's own release;
ScopeConfig.defaultWaitForChildrenTimeout — how long a scope waits for its child scopes to be disposed of before disposing of itself.

All four are three seconds by default. null removes the limit and every scope waits indefinitely, and so does ScopeTimeout.none — the value below, which says the same thing for a single scope and is accepted here too. An expired timeout is not fatal: it is reported through FlutterError.reportError, and the scope then proceeds as if the wait had succeeded — so a dependency that never completes its disposal degrades into a delay plus an error report instead of a deadlock.

The report is what ScopeConfig.timeoutReportsEnabled = false switches off, and all it switches off. The wait still gives up on time, the scope still goes on, the four callbacks are still called, and the observer still hears the expiry — with the very TimeoutException the report would have carried, so nothing is lost by taking the reporting over. It is for an application that reports expiries from its own observer: one expiry arriving twice, once as an event and once as a Flutter error, is what makes one of the two look like a second problem.

Two more waits share one of these defaults. The first takes no override of its own. When the initialization of a Scope fails, the dependency container releases what it had already built, and that release is bounded by ScopeConfig.defaultDisposeScopeTimeout rather than by the disposeScopeTimeout of the scope: a container knows nothing of the widget that owns it and works without one, so there is nothing there to read a per-scope value from. It is bounded at all because it is the path of a failed initialization — nothing downstream sees that failure until the container lets go, so a disposer that never finishes leaves the scope above showing its loading branch with nothing on screen and nothing in the console.

The second is the other half of the teardown of a Scope, and it does take the override. disposeScope is one method there and two steps — the state's own teardown, and then the container's — and each is bounded by disposeScopeTimeout of its own rather than by what the first left of the other. So a teardown where both steps hang reports two expiries and calls onDisposeScopeTimeout twice: two steps were given up on. Every other family has one step behind that method and one limit around it.

All four are measured on real time rather than on the clock of the zone the teardown runs in, which is what a widget test replaces with a fake one. A hang like the ones they exist for outlives frames, and a scope is usually taken down between them: a timer belonging to that zone would still be pending when the tree is gone, and flutter_test ends a test on exactly that. So a test of your own that has to wait one of these out waits in real time — pump(duration) moves the fake clock and reaches none of them.

pauseAfterInitialization is the exception, and deliberately: that delay is one the user sees, so a widget test drives it with pump(duration) like any other animation. The scope puts it out when it is taken down mid-pause.

Every scope can override all four defaults for itself with the scopeKeyTimeout, initCancellationTimeout, disposeScopeTimeout and waitForChildrenTimeout parameters, and observe an expiry through the onScopeKeyTimeout, onInitCancellationTimeout, onDisposeScopeTimeout and onWaitForChildrenTimeout callbacks. null there means "take the default", not "wait as long as it takes" — the second thing is said with ScopeTimeout.none:

AsyncScope(
  waitForChildrenTimeout: ScopeTimeout.none,   // this scope waits it out
  disposeScopeTimeout: const Duration(seconds: 5),
  …
)

It is a Duration of its own kind rather than a value to remember, so every one of these parameters stays a Duration? and nothing else about them changes. AsyncScopeCoordinator.waitForChildren and a parent's own waitForChildren take it too, for one call, and so do the four ScopeConfig defaults above.

Being a Duration of its own kind is also the one thing to know about it: it is told apart by its type, so it does not survive being computed with. ScopeTimeout.none == const Duration(microseconds: -1) is true, and ScopeTimeout.none + Duration.zero is an ordinary Duration — what comes back from any arithmetic is the negative length behind the marker, which a timer reads as "expire at once". The package asserts against a negative limit wherever it resolves one, so this is loud in debug rather than silent; a timeout is still a value to pass on rather than one to compute with.

initCancellationTimeout is the one that refuses it, with an assert. A cancellation waits for the initialization to finish, and an initialization parked on a future that never completes never does — an unbounded wait there is the hang the limit exists to prevent. Removing that one is a decision for the whole application, and ScopeConfig.defaultInitCancellationTimeout is where it is made — as null, or as the ScopeTimeout.none that means the same thing there. The assert is raised inside the teardown's own guard for that stage, so it arrives as onError with ScopePhase.initializationCancellation and the teardown goes on.

pauseAfterInitialization refuses it too, with an assert of its own, and for the opposite reason: a pause is a stretch of time to hold the ready branch back for rather than a limit on a wait, and "wait as long as it takes" has nothing to say about one. That assert is raised while the scope is becoming ready, so it arrives as onError with ScopePhase.initialization and the scope shows its error branch.

pauseAfterInitializationEnabled

pauseAfterInitialization is an artificial delay between the moment a scope becomes ready and the moment its subtree is shown; it exists to keep a loading indicator visible long enough to be read instead of blinking.

ScopeConfig.pauseAfterInitializationEnabled = false switches every such pause off globally, without touching the widgets that declare it. Set it in the setup of a widget test, or while stepping through an initialization in the debugger.

reset()

The switches above — the pause and the four timeouts — are global and outlive the code that changed them, so a test that raises a timeout and forgets to put it back hands the next test a different package. ScopeConfig.reset() puts all five back to their defaults:

void main() {
  tearDown(ScopeConfig.reset);
  …
}

setUp works as well, and covers a test that failed before its own teardown ran. The observer is left alone: it is an object rather than a switch, and it is usually the whole point of the run it was assigned for. A suite that wants it gone puts it back itself — ScopeConfig.observer = null.

In tests

An observer that records instead of printing turns the lifecycle into a value a test can assert on. Compare the whole list at once: that catches a missing event and one too many alike, which a verify per event does not.

final class RecordingObserver extends ScopeObserver {
  final events = <String>[];

  @override
  void onInit(ScopeObservable target) =>
      events.add('init ${target.debugLabel}');

  @override
  void onReady(ScopeObservable target) =>
      events.add('ready ${target.debugLabel}');

  @override
  void onDisposed(ScopeObservable target) =>
      events.add('disposed ${target.debugLabel}');
}

void main() {
  late RecordingObserver observer;

  setUp(() {
    observer = RecordingObserver();
    ScopeConfig.observer = observer;
    ScopeConfig.pauseAfterInitializationEnabled = false;
  });

  tearDown(() {
    ScopeConfig.observer = null;
    ScopeConfig.reset();
  });

  testWidgets('the scope initializes once and is disposed of once',
      (tester) async {
    await tester.pumpWidget(const CounterScope(tag: 'counter'));
    await tester.pumpAndSettle();
    await tester.pumpWidget(const SizedBox());
    await tester.pumpAndSettle();

    expect(observer.events, [
      'init CounterScope(counter)',
      'ready CounterScope(counter)',
      'disposed CounterScope(counter)',
    ]);
  });
}

Two things that expectation depends on. The scope is tagged, because an untagged one labels itself with a short hash that is different on every run — tag it, or strip the (…) off the label before comparing. And the observer is cleared in the teardown, because ScopeConfig.reset() does not clear it: an observer left behind goes on recording into the next test's list.

Keep trace out of it unless the trace is what the test is about. At that level a single scope produces a dozen events, and an expectation that lists them all fails on every unrelated change to the coordination.

See example/minimal for the setup of a real application, and example/scopo_demo for a demo that shows every lifecycle call of every scope family side by side.

Coming from 0.12.x

A dependency container no longer reports its disposal through onProgress. The release of each dependency arrives at onDisposalProgress(target, path) instead, and the step it belongs to is announced ahead of it by onDisposalStepStarted(target, path).

An existing onProgress override keeps compiling, which is the awkward part of this one: it still overrides a method that still exists — it just stops being called for the disposal, and nothing points at the change. If yours told the two halves apart by the type of progress, that branch is now a hook:

// before
final class BeforeObserver extends ScopeObserver {
  @override
  void onProgress(ScopeObservable target, Object? progress) {
    if (progress is String) {
      log('released $progress');
    } else {
      log('built $progress');
    }
  }
}

// after
final class AfterObserver extends ScopeObserver {
  @override
  void onProgress(ScopeObservable target, Object? progress) =>
      log('built $progress');

  @override
  void onDisposalProgress(ScopeObservable target, String path) =>
      log('released $path');
}

ScopeCompositeObserver and ScopePrintObserver come with the package and were changed with it; an observer of your own is the only thing to look at.

One way this release can fail a build rather than go quiet. Three names are added to ScopeObserver, and Dart has no overloading: a subclass that already has a member of its own called onStepStarted, onDisposalStepStarted or onDisposalProgress now declares an invalid override. Rare — they are not obvious names for a helper — but it is a compile error rather than a change of behaviour, so the analyzer names it and renaming your member settles it.

Coming from 0.9.x

The nine public names built on logger_builder are gone: ScopeConfig.logger, ScopeLogger, ScopeLevelLogger, ScopeLog, ScopeLogPublisher, ScopeLogFormatter, ScopeLogTransformer, ScopeLogLevel and ScopeLogCallback. The package no longer depends on logger_builder.

What each of them was for:

ScopeConfig.logger.level = ScopeLogLevel.info → ScopeConfig.observer = const ScopePrintObserver();
ScopeLogLevel.debug → const ScopePrintObserver(trace: true);
ScopeLogLevel.off → ScopeConfig.observer = null;
a publisher that formatted and printed → the output of ScopePrintObserver, or a ScopeObserver of your own;
a publisher that collected the logs into a list to assert on → an observer that records, as under "In tests" above;
a transformer that dropped the logs of one path → an if inside the hook, on target.debugLabel or on the type of target;
routing failures onward by parsing ScopeLog.message → onError, with the error, the stack trace and a ScopePhase already separated.

There is no threshold any more, and nothing that takes its place as one value. Its three jobs are split: ScopeConfig.observer = null turns everything off, an empty hook body turns off one kind of event, and trace turns off the noisiest kind.

debug topic

debug

The observer

The twelve hooks

Who sends them

The last entry with no exit

What `onProgress` carries

`onError` and `ScopePhase`

`onError` and `ScopeErrorRoute`

What `onTimeout` covers

What `onTrace` covers

Who the event is about

ScopePrintObserver

When the observer itself fails

Timeouts

pauseAfterInitializationEnabled

reset()

In tests

Coming from 0.12.x

Coming from 0.9.x

Classes

Enums

scopo package

debug topic

debug topic

debug

The observer

The twelve hooks

Who sends them

The last entry with no exit

What onProgress carries

onError and ScopePhase

onError and ScopeErrorRoute

What onTimeout covers

What onTrace covers

Who the event is about

ScopePrintObserver

When the observer itself fails

Timeouts

pauseAfterInitializationEnabled

reset()

In tests

Coming from 0.12.x

Coming from 0.9.x

Classes

Enums

scopo package

debug topic

What `onProgress` carries

`onError` and `ScopePhase`

`onError` and `ScopeErrorRoute`

What `onTimeout` covers

What `onTrace` covers