at property

String? at
getter/setter pair

At is when the thing was so, RFC 3339. Required, and refused when it sits more than five minutes ahead of the server clock — an assertion dated further out would never mature and would skew every read until it did.

Please note: This property should have been non-nullable! Since the specification file does not include a default value (using the "default:" property), however, the generated source code must fall back to having a nullable type. Consider adding a "default:" property in the specification file to hide this note.

Implementation

String? at;